Blog

  • Passenger jet had to abort takeoff to avoid runway collision at New York’s LaGuardia Airport

    Passenger jet had to abort takeoff to avoid runway collision at New York’s LaGuardia Airport



    When a passenger jet roaring down the runway toward takeoff at New York’s LaGuardia Airport had to slam on the brakes earlier this month because another plane was still on the runway, Renee Hoffer and all the other passengers were thrown forward in their seats.

    Hoffer wound up in the emergency room the next day after the near miss on May 6 because her neck started hurting and her left arm went numb.

    “The stop was as hard as any car accident I’ve been in,” Hoffer said.

    Both the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board said Monday that they are investigating the incident in which a Republic Airways jet had to abort takeoff and slam to a stop because a United Airlines plane was still taxiing across the runway. The close call happened despite the airport being equipped with an advanced surface radar system that’s designed to help prevent such close calls.

    In audio from the tower that ABC obtained from the website www.LiveATC.net, the air traffic controller said to the pilot of the Republic Airways jet: “Sorry, I thought United had cleared well before that.”

    At the time that controller was directing the Republic Airways jet to takeoff, a ground controller on a different radio frequency was directing the United plane to a new taxiway after it missed the first one it was supposed to use to exit the runway.

    When the passengers got off the plane after the close call at 12:35 a.m., Hoffer said the gate agents refused to even give them hotel vouchers for the night because they blamed the weather even though another passenger said she had an app on her phone that showed another plane was on the runway.

    Hoffer said she’s been stuck in a customer service nightmare since the flight Republic was operating for American Airlines ended abruptly. She said neither the airline nor the FAA has answered her complaints while she continues to nurse the pinched nerve in her neck that the ER doctors identified.

    Both the airlines and the airport referred questions to the FAA.

    The number of close calls in recent years has created serious concerns for the FAA, NTSB and other safety experts. The NTSB’s investigation of a February 2023 close call in Austin highlighted the concerns, but there have been a number of other high-profile near misses. In one case, a Southwest Airlines jet coming in for a landing in Chicago narrowly avoided smashing into a business jet crossing the runway.

    LaGuardia is one of just 35 airports across the country equipped with the FAA’s best technology to prevent such runway incursions. The ASDS-X system uses a variety of technology to help controllers track planes and vehicles on the ground. At the other 490 U.S. airports with a control tower, air traffic controllers have to rely on more low-tech tools like a pair of binoculars to keep track of aircraft on the ground because the systems are expensive.

    Expanding the systems to more airports is something Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy would like to do if Congress signs off on his multi-billion-dollar plan to overhaul the nation’s aging air traffic control system.

    But it’s clear the technology is not perfect because close calls continue happening. The FAA is taking a number of additional steps to try to reduce the number of close calls, and it plans to install an additional warning system at LaGuardia in the future.

    But the rate of runway incursions per 1 million takeoffs and landings has remained around 30 for a decade. The rate got as high as 35 in 2017 and 2018. But generally there are fewer than 20 of the most serious kind of incursions where a collision was narrowly avoided or there was a significant potential for a crash, according to the FAA. That number did hit 22 in 2023 but fell to just 7 last year.

    To help, there are efforts to develop a system that will warn pilots directly about traffic on a runway instead of alerting the controller and relying on them to relay the warning. That could save precious seconds. But the FAA has not yet certified a system to warn pilots directly that Honeywell International has been developing for years.

    The worst accident in aviation history occurred in 1977 on the Spanish island of Tenerife, when a KLM 747 began its takeoff roll while a Pan Am 747 was still on the runway; 583 people died when the planes collided in thick fog.



    Source link

  • Mahmoud Khalil’s legal team releases new video of arrest interaction with ICE agents

    Mahmoud Khalil’s legal team releases new video of arrest interaction with ICE agents


    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

    • Now Playing

      Mahmoud Khalil’s legal team releases new video of arrest interaction with ICE agents

      01:02

    • UP NEXT

      All-out search continues for 7 escaped New Orleans inmates

      02:48

    • New law criminalizes posting of non-consensual explicit images

      00:58

    • CBS News CEO Wendy McMahon steps down

      00:26

    • Suspect identified in fertility center car bombing

      01:41

    • More than 30 million under severe weather alerts

      02:10

    • NTSB Investigating Mexican tall ship’s crash into Brooklyn Bridge

      01:40

    • Biden battling ‘aggressive’ form of prostate cancer

      03:53

    • Man accused in New Jersey wildfire says he ‘had the flame almost out’

      01:56

    • NTSB investigates fatal Mexican navy ship crash into Brooklyn Bridge

      02:44

    • Special Report: Trump signs bill targeting explicit deepfakes

      17:47

    • ‘Take It Down Act’ criminalizes publishing of explicit AI-generated deepfakes online

      02:02

    • Dawn Richard testifies in Sean Combs’ sex trafficking trial

      02:54

    • ‘Something changed in him’: Father of fertility clinic bombing suspect speaks out

      01:04

    • Fertility clinic attack: New details emerge on suspect’s ideology

      01:51

    • Inside the search for 7 inmates still on the run after brazen escape

      02:44

    • Mexican Navy ship: New images show sailors hanging from rigging

      02:24

    • Weekend of devastating tornadoes across US kills dozens

      03:38

    • Manhunt continues for 7 remaining escaped New Orleans inmates

      02:01

    • Officials provide details on Las Vegas gym shooting

      01:21

    The new video appears to show Mahoud Khalil cooperating with ICE agents before he was detained. His legal team claims the video contradicts the government’s argument that he was a flight risk.



Source link

  • Hearing on Menendez brothers’ parole suitability pushed back to late summer

    Hearing on Menendez brothers’ parole suitability pushed back to late summer


    A hearing that could lead to freedom for the Menendez brothers, convicted in their parents’ murders in 1989, was pushed back from June 13 to August, California corrections officials said Monday.

    A spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said the brothers’ hearings on parole suitability will instead be on Aug. 21 and 22.

    Erik Menendez, 54, and Lyle Menendez, 57, scored a victory in court on May 13 when a judge resentenced them, a move that made them immediately eligible for parole. They had been sentenced to life without the possibility of parole in the killings of their parents, José and Kitty Menendez.

    Lyle, left, and Erik Menendez sit in Beverly Hills Municipal Court in 1990.
    Lyle and Erik Menendez in Beverly Hills Municipal Court in 1990.Nick Ut / AP file

    Hearings in a separate effort seeking clemency from California Gov. Gavin Newsom were initially scheduled for June 13, and, subsequently, parole suitability hearings were added to that date.

    Scott Wyckoff, executive officer of the Board of Parole Hearings, explained the situation in a letter obtained by the Los Angeles Times:

    “Since the ruling makes them immediately eligible for parole consideration as youth offenders, it is the Board’s intent to convert the June 13, 2025, clemency hearings to initial parole suitability hearings.”

    The Board of Parole Hearings converted the June 13 clemency hearings to parole consideration hearings after it informed key parties, including members of the victims’ families, of the possibility. Parties raised objections to the conversion, a corrections department spokesperson said, leading to the parole hearing’s being postponed until August.

    The brothers’ clemency application with the governor remains active.

    In August, parole commissioners will be tasked with determining whether the brothers pose an unreasonable risk of danger if they are released on parole. Prosecutors, victims’ relatives and others can weigh in during the hearings.

    The brothers have been serving their time at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego County. They were convicted in their parents’ 1989 murders, which prosecutors said were motivated by their desire to take over the family’s money.

    Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic found this month that they do not pose an “unreasonable risk” if they are released and resentenced them to 50 years to life, opening up the possibility of parole.

    Mark Geragos, a lawyer for the pair, and other supporters have alleged the murders were the result of self-defense amid their father’s reaction to Lyle’s claims that he sexually abused Erik.

    Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman opposed resentencing, in part because, he contended, the brothers had not taken full responsibility for their crimes. Speaking after their resentencing, the brothers said they have taken full responsibility and offered no justification for killing their parents.



    Source link

  • Justice Department to investigate Chicago after mayor’s remarks about hiring Black officials

    Justice Department to investigate Chicago after mayor’s remarks about hiring Black officials



    The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said Monday that it was opening an investigation into the city of Chicago after Mayor Brandon Johnson’s comments Sunday highlighting prominent Black officials in his administration.

    Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon wrote in a letter to Johnson posted on X that she had “authorized an investigation” into whether Chicago is “engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination” following Johnson’s remarks at a church Sunday.

    “If these kind of hiring decisions are being made for top-level positions in your administration, then it begs the question of whether such decisions are also being made for lower-level positions,” Dhillon wrote.

    Follow live politics coverage here

    Johnson said in remarks at Apostolic Church of God that the deputy mayor, the chief operations officer, the budget director and others are all Black people. Johnson said some of his detractors criticize him by saying the only thing he talks about “is the hiring of Black people.”

    “No, what I’m saying is when you hire our people, we always look out for everybody else,” he said.

    “Having people in my administration that will look out for the interest of everyone, and everyone means you have to look out for the interests of Black folks, because that hasn’t happened. That’s how we ensure long-term sustainable growth,” he added.

    Johnson had also criticized the Trump administration’s efforts to “wipe us out of history.”

    “Black folks will be here in this city and in cities across America, protecting this democracy, protecting humanity, because that’s what Black people have always done,” he said.

    The mayor’s office said in a statement that Johnson “is proud to have the most diverse administration in the history of our city.”

    “Our administration reflects the diversity and values of Chicago. Unfortunately, the current federal administration does not reflect either,” the mayor’s press office said.

    Shortly after his second inauguration, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to end what he referred to as “radical and wasteful” diversity, equity and inclusion offices and programs in federal agencies. He also has ordered investigations into hiring practices that he has said may favor candidates based on their race or gender.

    According to the mayor’s office, white and Black employees are a majority of staff members, with 30.5% of employees identifying as white and 34.3% identifying as Black.

    Johnson’s office said that it was aware the Justice Department had issued a letter and that it was waiting for official receipt and that its corporation counsel would then review it.

    The Civil Rights Division has undergone a major transformation since Dhillon took over during Trump’s second term, with one official calling an onslaught of departures “a complete bloodbath.”

    More broadly, the Justice Department has targeted Trump’s perceived political foes since he returned to office for a second term. In January, the Justice Department said it had terminated several attorneys from former special counsel Jack Smith’s office who played roles in Trump’s prosecution over his handling of classified documents and his conduct tied to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

    Trump has issued executive orders going after major law firms that have been involved in suing him or his administration. He also authorized Attorney General Pam Bondi to recommend rescinding attorneys’ security clearances or ending federal contracts with law firms if she found their lawsuits against the administration “unreasonable” or “vexatious.”



    Source link

  • Video appears to show Mahmoud Khalil cooperating with ICE agents before he was detained

    Video appears to show Mahmoud Khalil cooperating with ICE agents before he was detained


    Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil’s legal team on Monday released new footage of the minutes leading up to his March arrest that they say contradicts the government’s argument that he was a flight risk, which officials had said justified his detainment without an arrest warrant. 

    The Columbia activist who helped organize pro-Palestinian rallies on campus a year ago has been held in a detention center in Louisiana for two months. The Syrian-born green card holder has been fighting his detention and deportation since his arrest, which was the first under the White House administration’s promised campaign against students who protested the war in Gaza.

    The five-minute security footage was obtained by Khalil’s legal team through a subpoena, which Columbia University complied with. The video has no sound, and the faces of the ICE agents are blurred. The clip was pulled from five hours of footage that Columbia University turned over to Khalil’s legal team.

    Mahmoud Khalil arrest video footage security surveillance
    Moments before Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest in New York City on March 8.Courtesy Mahmoud Khalil’s Legal team via Columbia University

    The video begins in the lobby of Khalil’s New York City apartment building with him speaking to his attorney on the phone and interacting with the four ICE officers while Khalil’s wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, walks toward a hallway. Abdalla, according to Khalil’s legal team, went to get Khalil’s green card from their apartment. 

    Khalil can also been seen interacting with the ICE agents and handing them his phone on two occasions to speak with his attorney, his legal team said. Khalil appears calm and cooperative, and at one point he appears to laugh with the agents. 

    At the end of the video, Abdalla returns to the lobby and gives Khalil his green card, which he turns over to the agents. The video ends after Khalil hands his green card to them. 

    In April, the government said in court documents that ICE agents allowed Abdalla to get Khalil’s “conditional residence card which was located in their apartment, in lieu of arresting him” while Khalil and the agents “remained in the foyer.” 

    The government stated in its court filing that the agents asked Khalil “to cooperate while they attempted to verify his identify, but the respondent stated that he would not cooperate and that he was going to leave the scene.”

    “The HSI supervisory agent believed there was a flight risk and arrest was necessary,” the filing stated.

    The Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department did not immediately respond Monday night to requests for comment about the newly released security video.

    NBC News previously reported video footage of the moment of his arrest, which showed Khalil cooperating and telling officers, “Yes, I’m coming with you.” That video was taken by Khalil’s wife. 

    Kahlil’s legal team said the latest video provides strength to their fight.

    “The world now knows ICE unconstitutionally arrested Mahmoud in retaliation for his defense of Palestinian rights and lives,” Ramzi Kassem — co-director of Creating Law Enforcement Accountability & Responsibility (CLEAR), a legal aid group at the City University of New York’s law school — said Monday. “After the government finally admitted that agents did not even have an administrative warrant for Mahmoud’s arrest, this video is the nail in the coffin of ICE’s lies: it shows, plain as day, that Mahmoud was calm and collected and that he never tried to run.”

    Khalil has not been accused of criminal conduct, but the Trump administration has argued he should be expelled from the country for his beliefs.

    The administration has maintained that it has the authority to deport Khalil because he “led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.”

    NBC News reviewed more than 100 pages of documents submitted by the federal government in its effort to deport Khalil, which showed that the government appeared to rely on unverified tabloid articles about him.

    Last month, an immigration judge in Louisiana affirmed the federal government’s argument that Khalil’s beliefs threaten national security and justify his deportation. 

    Days later, New Jersey District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled that Kahlil could continue his fight for freedom in federal court.

    His legal team has said it will “continue working tirelessly until Mahmoud is free.”




    Source link

  • Senate advances a major crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote

    Senate advances a major crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote



    WASHINGTON — The Senate advanced a major cryptocurrency regulation bill Monday on a bipartisan vote two weeks after every Senate Democrat united to block it

    The procedural vote on the GENIUS Act — which would establish the first regulatory framework for issuers of stablecoins, digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar — was 66-32. Sixteen Democrats voted with the majority of Senate Republicans to advance the bill. Two Republicans, Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Jerry Moran of Kansas, voted against it.

    The bill needed to cross the 60-vote threshold to advance to final passage in the Senate, where Republicans hold a three-seat majority.

    Democratic support to proceed with the legislation was unlocked after a group of bipartisan negotiators — Sens. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn; Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md.; and Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz. — reached an agreement late last week on an amendment to the bill that addressed key sticking points for Democrats. 

    The amendment, which Democratic negotiators circulated over the weekend and has been obtained by NBC News, includes new changes to consumer protection safeguards and limits on tech companies issuing stablecoins, and it would extend ethics standards to special government employees — which would temporarily apply to Elon Musk and tech entrepreneur David Sacks. 

    In exchange for a vote on the amendment, Democrats involved in negotiations said they have committed to support the GENIUS Act even if the amendment fails, according to multiple sources familiar with the talks. 

    Senate Republicans have been noncommittal about backing the amendment, but the updated changes are likely to get more Democrats on board beyond the core group involved in negotiations.

    The bill hit a roadblock two weeks ago when Democrats, along with two Republicans — Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Josh Hawley of Missouri — blocked the bill from advancing, demanding stronger national security and anti-money laundering provisions. 

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., criticized his colleagues across the aisle for delaying the vote, pointing out that no changes have been made to the underlying bill that Democrats blocked two weeks ago. 

    “It’s really hard to understand why we needed to wait an additional 11 days for Democrats to finally agree to move,” Thune said Monday, adding that he expects the Senate won’t vote on final passage before it leaves for the Memorial Day recess. 

    The Trump family’s crypto dealings with World Liberty Financial, and President Donald Trump’s dinner for the top holders of his meme coin, have aggravated concerns among Democrats. (Meme coins are different from stable coins, as they typically derive value from internet culture rather than from an underlying utility or asset.) But no provisions in the negotiated amendment would prohibit Trump and his family from continuing their crypto ventures. 

    The bill text includes a provision that would “prohibit any member of Congress or senior executive branch official from issuing a payment stablecoin product during their time in public service.”

    Some Democrats have argued it needs to be stronger.

    “Basic flaws remain unaddressed,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the top Democrat on the Banking Committee, said on the Senate floor Monday. “Congress should not choose to enable the president’s egregious corruption.”

    Several Senate Democrats have also introduced bills targeting the Trump family’s crypto ventures to prevent the president from potentially profiting off of the deals. 

    Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., for example, plans to offer legislation called the STABLE Act, which would prevent elected officials and federal candidates from issuing or endorsing digital assets, as an amendment to the GENIUS Act. 

    Democrats are expected to force votes on those bills this week, but they are unlikely to go anywhere in the GOP-controlled chamber.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., convened a caucus-wide call Sunday night to discuss the GENIUS Act. Warren voiced her concerns about the bill during the call, according to a person with knowledge of her comments. 

    While some Democrats like Warren said they can’t vote for the bill without stronger provisions that limit Trump’s profiting from digital assets, others, like Warner, argued that Congress can no longer sit on the sidelines of the evolving cryptocurrency space.

    “Many senators, myself included, have very real concerns about the Trump family’s use of crypto technologies to evade oversight, hide shady financial dealings, and personally profit at the expense of everyday Americans,” Warner, who voted to advance the GENIUS Act, wrote in a statement Monday. 

    “But we cannot allow that corruption to blind us to the broader reality: blockchain technology is here to stay. If American lawmakers don’t shape it, others will — and not in ways that serve our interests or democratic values,” he added.

    If the Senate ultimately passes the GENIUS Act, its future is less clear in the House, where there is a different bill to regulate stablecoin issuers. Cryptocurrency advocates argue that Congress should also pass legislation to determine regulatory treatment of digital assets and digital asset securities.

    “The winners, if Congress passes this bill, are Americans who want to make payments faster and easier to access,” said Kara Calvert, the vice president for public policy at Coinbase, a cryptocurrency exchange. “It’s transformational technology, so passing this bill is a win for them. It’s not just a win for the industry or a political candidate.”



    Source link

  • A new Miami Beach underwater art installation aims to help coral thrive

    A new Miami Beach underwater art installation aims to help coral thrive


    MIAMI BEACH, Fla. — South Beach has long been known for its Art Deco pastels and neon nightlife. But it’s also home to something else: a bustling coral reef just hundreds of feet offshore.

    Soon, that natural reef is expected to be along the path of a roughly seven-mile public art installation, called The Reefline, which will be part sculpture park and part snorkeling trail celebrating and supporting marine life.

    “Mother Nature is the ultimate artist,” said Reefline founder and artistic director Ximena Caminos. “What we’re doing is giving nature and amplifying that marine habitat, because it’s needed.”

    fish coral reef miami beach florida underwater aquatic aqua sea
    A fish swims off Miami in a coral reef area.NBC News

    Corals are struggling worldwide; The Reefline hopes to help them flourish in South Florida, starting with its Phase 1 rollout this year when a series of concrete cars will be submerged, creating a traffic jam.

    “How do we turn doomsday into optimism?” said Caminos.

    Those sculptures won’t just drive conversation. The Reefline says they’ll give fish shelter; fish will help corals thrive. According to organizers, the new marine communities will provide an added benefit: beachfront erosion prevention.

    Artificial reefs are not a new concept.

    But The Reefline’s coral expert, Colin Foord, said the new project goes further by rescuing dislodged, climate-resilient corals whose clones will be locked onto the project’s planned hybrid reef. 

    “We are accelerating the development of a fully healthy coral reef by decades by putting out small pieces of coral that we are growing here in the lab,” Foord said in a Miami lab housing submerged corals.

    “When you put the mask on and you get into the water, it’s like time slows down,” said Foord. 

    “I think that if more people have that type of opportunity, then that helps change public perception about the need to protect the environment.”

     

     



    Source link

  • ‘Love Island’ contestant Cashel Barnett charged with domestic violence in Utah

    ‘Love Island’ contestant Cashel Barnett charged with domestic violence in Utah


    “Love Island” contestant Cashel Barnett is accused of assaulting his ex in front of their child and was being held without bail in a Utah jail Monday.

    The district attorney in Salt Lake County filed charges against the 34-year-old on May 12 that include felony aggravated assault, felony domestic violence in the presence of a child, and two counts of misdemeanor assault.

    A lawyer for Barnett said his client turned himself in Monday morning and is awaiting a bail hearing scheduled for Thursday.

    “We are obviously in the very early stages here and won’t have any comment until after that hearing,” Andrew K. Deesing said by email.

    According to Salt Lake City police, the mother of the pair’s 1-year-old child reported the alleged incident, which she said happened April 10, on April 24.

    She told police that when she attempted to calm Barnett during an argument in front of the child, he slapped her arms and picked her up by her neck using both hands before slamming her onto a bed, the police report states.

    The report states that Barnett allegedly throttled the woman with “continuous pressure,” and the woman “was unable to breathe and her vision went blurry.”

    “Barnett then slapped Mikayl in the face and said, ‘You’re fine,’” the police report said.

    The woman told police she experienced “difficulty breathing, a raspy voice, coughing, trouble swallowing, neck pain, nausea, vomiting, agitation, amnesia, memory loss, visual changes, and headache,” according to the police report.

    It doesn’t mention whether she sought medical attention,

    The warrant request warns that the woman is at high risk for homicide and that she told authorities Barnett had previously threatened to kill her, the report says.

    Court records confirm he was not in custody for days following approval of the May 12 warrant request.

    Barnett appeared on the first season of “Love Island” in 2019. According to his social media and websites, the Salt Lake City-based personality now plays the drums in multiple bands, works as a model, and sells custom birthday and greetings videos for prices that start at $25.



    Source link

  • Judge orders Trump administration to allow attorneys access to Venezuelan man in Salvadoran prison

    Judge orders Trump administration to allow attorneys access to Venezuelan man in Salvadoran prison


    A federal judge in Texas ordered the Trump administration on Monday to facilitate contact between a Venezuelan man deported to El Salvador and his lawyers, giving the federal government until Wednesday afternoon to do so. 

    It’s the first such order in the mounting legal saga surrounding President Donald Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport hundreds of men to a supermax prison in El Salvador notorious for human rights abuses. The Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, offers zero contact between inmates and the outside world, including their lawyers and families. 

    The order by judge Keith P. Ellison of the Southern District of Texas gives the government 24 hours to confirm the location of the plaintiff — a 24-year-old Venezuelan man — and 48 hours to “restore and help maintain attorney-client communication” with him. 

    “This shows that the court is as concerned as we are as to the whereabouts of this individual and the illegal justification for his continued detention,” said Javier Rivera, the Houston lawyer representing Widmer Josneyder Agelviz Sanguino, the incarcerated Venezuelan man. 

    The Trump administration is expected to appeal the order to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. The federal government has been ordered before, including by the Supreme Court, to facilitate the return to the United States of people deported to El Salvador, most notably Kilmar Abrego Garcia, and has argued in response that it has no jurisdiction or ability to do so. Until now, it has not been ordered to facilitate contact between inmates and their lawyers.

    Agelviz initially traveled to the United States in September with his mother and two younger brothers as part of the U.S.’s refugee resettlement program, a process that involves extensive vetting and background checks. When they arrived at the airport in Houston, immigration agents detained Agelviz. 

    Documents reviewed by NBC News show that Agelviz was detained because of a tattoo on his forearm that includes a clock and a rose, images a CBP agent wrote are “associated” with the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. The documents show he had no criminal record and there was no additional evidence linking him to the gang.

    “My son is not a gang member,” said Lisbeth Carolina Sanguino, Agelviz’s mother, who is now living in San Antonio with her two other sons. “He’s a young man who’s never hurt anyone.” 

    Lisbeth Carolina Sanguino, the mother of Widmer Agilviz, says her family obtained refugee status to stay in the U.S.
    Lisbeth Carolina Sanguino, the mother of Widmer Josneyder Agelviz, says her family obtained provisional refugee status to stay in the U.S.NBC News

    Sanguino hired a lawyer to prove her son’s innocence in immigration court. But only two weeks before the immigration court case was set to be resolved, Agelviz and hundreds of other men from Venezuela were shipped with no warning or court hearings to El Salvadors. Attorneys for the men argue that their sudden deportation violated their due process, an issue now at the center of legal challenges to return them to the United States and prevent further similar deportations.

    Advocates and lawyers representing the men in CECOT have found that a majority of them had no criminal record. Many also did not violate any immigration laws when they came to the US, according to a recent analysis by the Cato Institute, often crossing the U.S.-Mexico border with appointments under the CBP One app. 

    But at least three, including Agelviz, came to the United States under the refugee resettlement program, according to Michelle Brané, executive director of Together and Free, a nonprofit assisting more than a hundred families of deported Venezuelans. 

    Applicants for refugee status go through months of vetting conducted at the migrant’s location abroad, not at the border, including extensive background checks by both U.S. and international law enforcement agencies to ensure the individual does not pose a public safety threat to the United States. 

    “Refugees are always very carefully screened before they are admitted into the United States,” Brané said. “It seems particularly unlikely that they would have made it through that entire process and really have some serious indication of being such a dangerous criminal.”

    In a statement, a White House official told NBC News that “DHS intelligence assessments go well beyond just gang affiliate tattoos and social media. Tren De Aragua is one of the most violent and ruthless terrorist gangs on planet earth. They rape, maim, and murder for sport. President Trump and Secretary Noem will not allow criminal gangs to terrorize American citizens. ” 

    The statement did not offer any additional evidence linking any of the refugees deported to CECOT to Tren de Aragua or to criminal activity of any kind. However, the official added: “We are confident in our law enforcement’s intelligence, and we aren’t going to share intelligence reports and undermine national security every time a gang member denies he is one. That would be insane.”

    The Department of Homeland Security document explaining the reasons for Agelviz’s detention indicates that he had no criminal record or incriminating information in his social media. It lists no evidence of gang affiliation beyond his tattoos.

    Those tattoos, Sanguino said, are references to her son’s childhood: his grandmother’s rose garden, and an owl that visited their home every night at 3 a.m., which is the time shown on the clock. 

    “I never approved of the tattoos,” Sanguino said. “But he asked me so much that when he turned 18, I finally said, ‘Go ahead, but I don’t want to see them.’” 

    Agelviz also tattooed his mother’s name and his brothers’ initials on his arm. “He thought because he got my name tattooed that I wouldn’t get mad at him,” she said. Her two younger sons do not have tattoos. 

    When they applied for refugee status and went through the screening process, which lasted around 10 months and involved several in-person interviews during which Agelviz was asked about his tattoos, the family was living in Ecuador. They had fled Venezuela for reasons they asked not to divulge in order to protect family members still at risk.

    The refugee program is reserved for people fleeing armed conflict and targeted persecution; it is rarely granted to Venezuelans or other migrants from the Americas, and is typically associated with people fleeing war in the Middle East and Africa. 

    Like all loved ones of men deported to CECOT, Sanguino has had no contact with her son for more than two months. 

    “It’s very difficult for me as a mother to have to imagine the situation my son is in without being able to do anything about it, without knowing how he is,” she said. “How is his health, how is he eating, what is going through his mind?”

    The first and only glimpse at the conditions under which the men are being held came last week, when former congressman Matt Gaetz, as part of his show on One America News, accompanied a congressional delegation to the wing of CECOT holding Venezuelan deportees. (No other press outlets have been allowed access to this wing of the facility.) The prisoners there repeatedly shouted “Liberty!” and made the international hand signal for help.

    Watching the video, Sanguino said, only made things harder. 

    “I eat and I feel guilty, because I don’t know what he’s eating, or if he’s eating,” Sanguino said. She often wakes up anxious thinking of him. “And I want to think that it’s a nightmare, but feel sad every time I remember that it’s reality.”



    Source link

  • China says U.S. undermined trade talks with Huawei chip warning

    China says U.S. undermined trade talks with Huawei chip warning



    China on Monday accused the United States of undermining the two countries’ preliminary trade agreement after the U.S. issued an industry warning against using Chinese chips that singled out Huawei.

    Beijing has “demanded” that the Trump administration “correct its mistakes,” a spokesperson for China’s Commerce ministry told a reporter, calling the U.S. Commerce Department’s guidance “discriminatory” and “market distorting.”

    “China urges the U.S. to immediately correct its wrong practices,” the spokesperson said, according to a Google translation.

    “If the U.S. insists on its own way and continues to substantially damage China’s interests, China will take resolute measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,” the spokesperson said.

    The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the remarks.

    The U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security issued an alert last Tuesday warning of “the risks of using PRC advanced-computing ICs, including specific Huawei Ascend chips.”

    “These chips were likely developed or produced in violation of U.S. export controls,” the bureau said.

    That guidance came two days after the Trump administration announced a “China trade deal” following high-level talks in Geneva, Switzerland.

    Those negotiations led Washington and Beijing to agree to a 90-day pause on most of the tariffs that had ground trade between the two nations to a halt.

    President Donald Trump has said that U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods — which were slashed to 30% from 145% — could be dialed back up if a broader trade deal cannot be reached by the time the pause expires.

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called the talks “very constructive” and suggested “that perhaps the differences were not so large as maybe thought.”

    But Monday’s remarks suggested that the U.S. stance on Chinese chips could create a roadblock for further trade progress.

    “The U.S. abuses export control measures, tightens control over Chinese chip products on trumped-up charges, and even interferes with Chinese companies using chips produced in China,” the spokesperson for Beijing said.

    “The U.S. is overreaching, which is a typical unilateral bullying behavior. China firmly opposes it,” the spokesperson said.

    “The U.S.’s actions seriously damage the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies, seriously threaten the security and stability of the global semiconductor supply chain, and have a serious impact on global scientific and technological innovation,” the spokesperson added.

    “This practice of using unilateral protectionism to contain and isolate other countries will ultimately undermine the competitiveness of the US industry, and the result can only be to shoot itself in the foot.”



    Source link