Blog

  • Iran says it will continue nuclear talks with the U.S., shrugging off Trump’s threats

    Iran says it will continue nuclear talks with the U.S., shrugging off Trump’s threats


    Iran’s president said his country will continue talks with the United States over its rapidly advancing nuclear program but will not withdraw from its rights because of U.S. threats.

    “We are negotiating, and we will negotiate, we are not after war but we do not fear any threat,” President Masoud Pezeshkian said during a speech to navy officials broadcast by state television Saturday.

    “It is not like that they think if they threaten us, we will give up our human right and definite right,” Pezeshkian said. “We will not withdraw, we will not easily loose honorable military, scientific, nuclear in all fields.”

    The negotiations have reached the “expert” level, meaning the sides are trying to reach agreement on the details of a possible deal. But a major sticking point remains Iran’s enrichment of uranium, which Tehran insists it must be allowed to do and the Trump administration increasingly insists the Islamic Republic must give up.

    Iran US
    In this photo released by the Iranian Presidency Office, President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks to navy officials, in Tehran, Iran, Saturday. (Iranian Presidency Office via AP)AP

    President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to unleash airstrikes targeting Iran’s program if a deal isn’t reached. Iranian officials increasingly warn they could pursue a nuclear weapon with their stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels.

    Earlier on Friday, Trump said Iran received a proposal during the talks, though he did not elaborate.

    During his trip to region this week, Trump at nearly every event insisted Iran could not be allowed to obtain a nuclear bomb, something U.S. intelligence agencies assess Tehran is not actively pursuing, though its program is on the cusp of being able to weaponize nuclear material.

    Mohammad Eslami, the head of Iran’s atomic organization, stressed the peaceful nature of the program, saying it is under “continuous” monitoring by the U.N. nuclear watchdog, state TV reported Saturday.

    “No country is monitored by the agency like us,” Eslami said, adding that the agency inspected the country’s nuclear facilities more than 450 time in 2024. “Something about 25% of all the agency inspections” in the year.

    Meanwhile, Israel routinely has threatened to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities if it feels threatened, further complicating tensions in the Mideast already spiked by the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.

    In his first reaction to Trump’s regional visit, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Trump wasn’t truthful when he made claims about creating peace through power.

    “Trump said that he wanted to use power for peace, he lied. He and the U.S. administration used power for massacre in Gaza, for waging wars in any place they could,” Khamenei said Saturday during a meeting with teachers broadcast on state television.

    The U.S. has provided Israel with 10-ton bombs to “drop on Gaza children, hospitals, houses of people in Lebanon and anywhere else when they can,” Khamenei said.

    Khamenei, who has the final say on all Iranian state matters, reiterated his traditional stance against Israel.

    “Definitely, the Zionist regime is the spot of corruption, war, rifts. The Zionist regime that is lethal, dangerous, cancerous tumor should be certainly eradicated, and it will be,” he said, adding that the U.S. has imposed a pattern on Arab nations under which they cannot endeavor without U.S. support.

    “Surely this model has failed. With efforts of the regional nations, the U.S. should leave the region, and it will leave,” Khamenei said.

    Iran has long considered the U.S. military presence in the region as a threat on its doorstep, especially after Trump pulled the U.S. out of a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran in 2018 and reimposed crippling sanctions.



    Source link

  • Israel launches major new offensive in Gaza after a wave of airstrikes kill hundreds

    Israel launches major new offensive in Gaza after a wave of airstrikes kill hundreds


    The United Nations says 70% of Gaza is already “within Israeli militarized zones, under displacement orders, or both.”

    Fresh evacuation orders were issued last week, just days after Israel declared large swathes of Gaza City unsafe.

    On Friday, an NBC News team in Gaza captured people moving in search of safety, some driving in battered trucks while others used carts pulled by donkeys, while others fled on foot.

    “I’ve been displaced four times, back and forth,” said Yusra Abu Warda from the Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza. “There is no place, no shelter. I will stay on the streets.”

    Image: PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT
    Palestinians fleeing Gaza City on Friday after a wave of intense Israeli bombardment.BASHAR TALEB / AFP – Getty Images
    Image: BESTPIX - PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT
    A Palestinian man transports his family’s belongings on a horse-pulled cart as they fled Gaza City. AFP Contributor#AFP / AFP – Getty Images

    Other residents are have given up on moving despite the evacuation orders, too exhausted or disillusioned to flee yet again.

    “Last year, we saw hundreds of thousands forced from area to area, but now people are just too exhausted,” said Louise Wateridge, a spokesperson for UNRWA, speaking to NBC News from Amman, Jordan. “They’re just they’re just too tired to move.”

    After returning home during a six-week ceasefire in January and February, Wateridge said many Palestinians are now disregarding new orders, uncertain of their safety wherever they move.

    “They’re just kind of staying put and accepting that wherever they go, they’re not going to be safe,” she added.

    No aid has entered Gaza since March 2, and the risk of famine hangs over Gaza’s population, prompting alarm even among some of Israel’s closest allies.

    A U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aims to start work in the enclave by the end of May, transporting aid into Gaza via so-called secure hubs, from which aid groups will handle distribution, a source familiar with the plan told Reuters.

    Wateridge said the plan was “essentially using food to bait people, to move people around, to forcibly displaced people.”

    Image: PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT
    People sift through the rubble of the Zinati family home in Jabalia in the northern Gaza after it was destroyed in an Israeli strike on Friday.BASHAR TALEB / AFP – Getty Images

    “Is this going to be used to move people out of areas? Because if people are starving, of course, they will go,” she said. 

    “If the intent was genuine to feed people, that can be done tomorrow,” Wateridge said, referring to existing humanitarian systems that had been effectively distributing aid in the 16 months prior. “So that does beg to question what the intent is.”

    Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid, a claim the group denies.

    A senior Israeli security official said last week that the “humanitarian blockade will continue, and only later — after the operational phase begins and a large-scale civilian evacuation to the south is completed — will a humanitarian plan be implemented.”

    They added that, unlike in the past, the military “will remain in every area it secures to prevent the return of terror.”

    The mass internal displacement of Palestinians comes amid further reports that Palestinians could be relocated outside of Gaza. Earlier this year, Trump said that Jordan and Egypt could take in Palestinians from Gaza.

    On Friday, sources told NBC News that the Trump administration may be working on a plan to permanently relocate up to 1 million Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Libya, according to five people with knowledge of the effort.

    The plan is under serious enough consideration that the administration has discussed it with Libya’s leadership, two people with direct knowledge of the plans and a former U.S. official said. 

    No final agreement has been reached, and Israel has been kept informed of the administration’s discussions, the same three sources said.

    The State Department and the National Security Council did not respond to multiple requests for comment. However, after publication, a spokesperson denied the reports were true.



    Source link

  • Another Kentucky Derby winner not in the Preakness reignites debate about Triple Crown changes

    Another Kentucky Derby winner not in the Preakness reignites debate about Triple Crown changes



    BALTIMORE — Sovereignty is not running out of that starting gate in the Preakness Stakes on Saturday, two weeks after winning the Kentucky Derby. Yet he is still the talk of Pimlico Race Course this week.

    That is because owners and trainer Bill Mott opted to skip the Preakness and with it a chance at the Triple Crown because of the short turnaround. It is the second time in four years the Derby winner is not taking part for that reason, and the fifth time in seven years overall, the Preakness goes on with no Triple Crown on the line.

    The trend has reignited the debate about what, if anything needs to change with the Triple Crown, with ideas ranging from putting more space between the Derby, Preakness and Belmont Stakes to adding incentives to run in all three to changing the order of the races altogether. Like starters in baseball throwing fewer pitchers, elite horses now typically get much longer time between races, and the situation has put tradition and modernization of the sport head to head.

    The two-week turnaround now feels to many around the sport like an antiquated schedule when longer gaps are now the norm with an eye toward horse wear and tear and better performance. Thoroughbreds used to be trained and run at a much quicker interval.

    “It’s a question that has more than one side to it,” said Steve Asmussen, who has won more races than any other trainer in North America. “I love how hard it is to do, which makes it so special. And then would it be making it easier? Does it dilute it? That’s a great question. And I think that it’ll continue to be debated.”

    The debate

    It was debated constantly during the 37-year drought between Triple Crown champions from Affirmed in 1978 until Bob Baffert-trained American Pharoah swept the three races in 2015. Baffert’s Justify did it in 2018, too, and the chorus of voices calling for change was quieted.

    But then, for various reasons, there has been a Triple Crown chance in the Preakness only twice in the past seven years. The biggest draw of the middle leg — the anticipation for the possibility — went from being automatic to anything but.

    “It is troubling, and it has been troubling for several years,” said Jerry Bailey, a Hall of Fame jockey who won each of the three races twice and is now an NBC Sports analyst. “It’s completely flip-flopped from my generation when it was the rule that they would run back and the exception that they wouldn’t.”

    Many top trainers, including Baffert, D. Wayne Lukas, Mark Casse and Michael McCarthy have run a Derby horse in the Preakness or will this year. Others, like Mott, Chad Brown, Todd Pletcher and Brad Cox, are more reluctant to take the risk.

    “We need them in the game,” said Casse, who won the Preakness in 2019 with War of Will and has Sandman this year. “This is important. We want the best horses for our sport.”

    When Asmussen won a Triple Crown race for the first time with Curlin in the 2007 Preakness, it came after his horse finished third behind Street Sense and Hard Spun in the Kentucky Derby. Curlin, Street Sense and Hard Spun went 1-2-3 in the Preakness.

    “We are definitely running on a very different environment than we were then,” Asmussen said. “Every horse is an individual, every year is different, and it’s just very unique circumstances.”



    Source link

  • A streaming service re-rebrands and an infamous baseball ban is lifted: The news quiz

    A streaming service re-rebrands and an infamous baseball ban is lifted: The news quiz




    A retail giant is raising prices, the White House is welcoming refugees, and Cassie Ventura takes the stand. Test your knowledge of the week in news.



    Source link

  • A Russian drone strike in northeastern Ukraine kills 9 people, officials say

    A Russian drone strike in northeastern Ukraine kills 9 people, officials say


    A Russian drone struck a passenger bus in Ukraine’s northeastern Sumy region on Saturday, killing nine people and injuring four others, Ukrainian officials said. The attack came just hours after Moscow and Kyiv held their first direct peace talks in years which failed to yield a ceasefire.

    Ukraine’s national police released photos showing the aftermath of the strike in Sumy’s Bilopillia city, around 6 miles from the front line and border with Russia.

    The Associated Press could not independently verify details of the incident. There was no comment from Moscow.

    “This is another war crime by Russia — a deliberate strike on civilian transport that posed no threat,” the Sumy regional administration said in a post on the Telegram messaging app.

    Russian and Ukrainian officials met in Turkey on Friday in an attempt to reach a temporary ceasefire, but the talks ended after less than two hours without a breakthrough. It was the first face-to-face dialogue between the two sides since the early weeks of Moscow’s February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    And while both sides agreed on a large prisoner swap, they clearly remained far apart on key conditions for ending the fighting.

    One such condition for Ukraine, backed by its Western allies, is a temporary ceasefire as a first step toward a peaceful settlement. The Kremlin has pushed back against such a truce, which remains elusive.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he discussed the talks with U.S. President Donald Trump and the leaders of France, Germany, the U.K. and Poland. In a post on X from a European leadership meeting in Albania, he urged “tough sanctions” against Moscow if it rejects “a full and unconditional ceasefire and an end to killings.”

    In Istanbul, Kyiv and Moscow agreed to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war each, according to the heads of both delegations, in what would be their biggest such swap.

    Both sides also discussed a ceasefire and a meeting between their heads of state, according to chief Ukrainian delegate, Defense Minister Rustem Umerov.

    Medinsky, an aide to President Vladimir Putin, said both sides agreed to provide each other with detailed ceasefire proposals, with Ukraine requesting the heads of state meeting, which Russia took under consideration.



    Source link

  • Urgent search for Louisiana escaped inmates

    Urgent search for Louisiana escaped inmates


    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

    • Now Playing

      Urgent search for Louisiana escaped inmates

      02:52

    • UP NEXT

      Deadly Israeli airstrikes target Hamas in Gaza

      01:30

    • Devastating tornado hits St. Louis

      02:26

    • Comey facing investigation over post about Trump

      01:00

    • Cassie Ventura cross-examined in trial of Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs

      01:55

    • One-on-one with WNBA star Paige Bueckers

      01:31

    • Mother says pregnant daughter on ventilator is being kept alive because of Georgia abortion law

      01:36

    • Commuter chaos as NJ Transit engineers go on strike

      01:40

    • Missing woman found in California after weeks missing

      01:29

    • Justices hear arguments in birthright citizenship case

      02:03

    • Musk’s xAI supercomputer concerns some Memphis residents

      03:42

    • Walmart says it will have to raise some prices as trade war continues

      01:44

    • Cassie Ventura cross-examined in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ trial

      02:22

    • Trump strikes optimistic tone on Iran nuclear talks

      01:33

    • Air traffic control outage in critical Denver airport hub

      00:54

    • Three climbers killed after falling during hike in Washington State

      01:16

    • Inside Iran as Trump presses for nuclear deal

      01:20

    • Dangerous early heat wave scorches Texas

      01:35

    • New York shop transforms centuries-old wood into guitars

      01:33

    • Trump in Qatar on high-stakes mideast trip

      02:36

    Nightly News

    Authorities say nine inmates are still on the run after ten inmates who authorities considered “armed and dangerous” escaped a New Orleans jail overnight. So far only one has been recaptured. NBC News’ Priya Sridhar reports.

    NBC News NOW

    NBC News NOW

    NBC News NOW

    NBC News NOW

    NBC News NOW

    Play All



Source link

  • Trump admin permits sale of device that allows standard firearms to fire like machine guns

    Trump admin permits sale of device that allows standard firearms to fire like machine guns


    The Trump administration has decided to permit the sale of devices that enable standard firearms to fire like machine guns, a move that one person familiar with the matter said was “by far the most dangerous thing this administration has done” on gun policy.

    The Justice Department on Friday announced a settlement in a lawsuit brought by the National Association for Gun Rights. The lawsuit challenged an ATF rule banning “forced reset triggers” — devices that allow semiautomatic weapons to fire rapid bursts of bullets.

    “This Department of Justice believes that the 2nd Amendment is not a second-class right,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. “And we are glad to end a needless cycle of litigation with a settlement that will enhance public safety.”

    Vanessa Gonzalez, a spokeswoman for Giffords, the national gun violence prevention group led by former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, condemned the move.

    “The Trump administration has just effectively legalized machine guns. Lives will be lost because of his actions,” said Gonzalez. “This is an incredibly dangerous move that will enable shooters to inflict horrific damage. The only people who benefit from these being on the market are the people who will make money from selling them, everyone else will suffer the consequences.”

    Ongoing court battles

    The move comes after a majority of judges on the conservative 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals appeared to side with the gun rights group during oral arguments in the case in December. The judges cited a Supreme Court decision last year finding that another rapid-fire device, called a bump stock, did not convert firearms into illegal machine guns.

    Since the forced reset trigger devices will not be considered firearms, they can be purchased anonymously, without a background or age check. Machine guns have been illegal in the United States since 1986, a notion that even gun rights groups have come to accept.

    There have been several lawsuits over the forced reset trigger ban, and lower court judges had issued rulings that came down on both sides of the question. Assuming the 5th Circuit ruled against the ban, the issue likely would have ended up in front of the Supreme Court.

    But now the Trump administration is abandoning the effort to restrict the devices. A former senior ATF official criticized the move and predicted that the courts would have upheld a ban on reset trigger devices.

    “We were going to win this,” said the former senior ATF official. “These things are not like bump stocks.”

    Trump’s White House counsel, David Warrington, is a co-founder of the National Association for Gun Rights and was counsel of record in the lawsuit until he left to join the Trump administration. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about his role, if any, in the settlement discussions.

    Brady United, the country’s oldest gun violence prevention group, condemned Warrington’s role.

    “This dangerous backroom deal spearheaded by Trump’s general counsel — the co-founder of one of the biggest gun rights groups in the country — is not only an incredible abuse of power, but undermines decades of sensible gun safety policy and puts communities at immediate risk,” Kris Brown, the group’s president, said in a statement to NBC News.

    A DOJ official said Warrington was not involved in the settlement negotiations.

    A settlement ‘in perpetuity’

    Under the settlement, the Justice Department “will bind itself, in perpetuity, not to enforce the machine gun ban against any device that functions like forced reset triggers,” one person familiar with the settlement told NBC News. “ATF must also return thousands of seized forced reset triggers to their previous owners. In other words, machine guns will soon become legal to possess and purchase, and the federal government will flood the market with these devices.”

    Some of the most popular versions of forced reset triggers are made by a company called Rare Breed Triggers, which was sued by the ATF in a separate case. That case will have to be dropped as part of the settlement, one of the people familiar with it said.

    The Justice Department news release said the settlement “includes agreed-upon conditions that significantly advance public safety with respect to FRTs, including that Rare Breed will not develop or design FRTs for use in any pistol and will enforce its patents to prevent infringement that could threaten public safety. Rare Breed also agrees to promote the safe and responsible use of its products.”

    Proponents of the devices dispute that forced reset triggers turn standard guns into machine guns. But the ATF determined that the devices allow a semiautomatic AR-15 rifle to fire as fast as a military M-16 in automatic mode, according to court records.

    The effort to ban forced reset triggers originated in the first Trump administration, at the same time that the ATF also banned bump stocks, another device that enables rapid trigger pulls that mimic the firing rate of a machine gun. The gunman in the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting killed 58 people while firing from his hotel room window using bump stocks.

    James Brady
    Brady United is named for Ronald Reagan’s press secretary James Brady, who was injured in the 1981 assassination attempt on the president, and Brady’s wife.Walt Zebowski / AP file

    The Supreme Court ruled by a 6-3 margin last year that the bump stock ban was unlawful. The majority concluded the devices did not meet the definition of a machine gun because they didn’t allow for automatic fire with the single pull of a trigger.



    Source link

  • Netanyahu is the odd man out in Trump’s Middle East trip

    Netanyahu is the odd man out in Trump’s Middle East trip


    ABU DHABI — As President Donald Trump hopscotched around the Middle East this week, he was the star of elaborate ceremonies, announced new U.S. policies and unveiled billions of dollars in new economic partnerships.

    He even visited a mosque, remarking on the pride for he felt for “my friends” as he took in its beauty. “This is an incredible culture,” Trump said.

    But one omission on the trip became more glaring with each stop: Israel.

    Tensions between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were already bubbling up before the president spent the week visiting three of America’s key Arab allies: Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

    By the end of the trip on Friday, Trump seemed to put further strain on the relationship. He had spent the past few days meeting with Syria’s new leader — a former al Qaeda leader the U.S. had put a $10 million bounty on — and announced he was lifting sanctions on the country in a move Israel opposed but one that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia had urged the president to take.

    Follow live politics coverage here

    Trump told reporters he had discussed the sanctions decision with Netanyahu, framing it as widely supported by others.

    “I think it’s been very popular, certainly in the Middle East,” Trump said. He also cited conversations with bin Salman and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan who, he claimed, saw the move as critical to its chance of survival as a country.

    A day after promising to lift the sanctions, Trump praised Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa as a “young, attractive guy — tough guy,” and urged the former rebel fighter to join the Abraham Accords — the president’s signature foreign policy achievement from his first term that normalized ties between Israel and several Arab states.

    U.S. President Trump visits UAE
    President Donald Trump attends a business forum at Qasr Al Watan during the final stop of his Gulf visit, in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates on Friday.Amr Alfiky / Reuters

    During the trip, Trump also leaned into the notion of a deal with Iran being within striking distance, without putting forward any details to assuage some of Israel’s concerns. And on the eve of the president’s trip, his administration announced it had cut a unilateral deal with Hamas, the U.S.-designated terrorist organization that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, to secure the release of the last living American hostage in Gaza.

    “Hopefully this is the first of those final steps necessary to end this brutal conflict,” Trump said of the release of Edan Alexander. He added on Friday that “we’re going to find out pretty soon” if Israel is able to free the nearly two dozen hostages believed to be alive in Gaza.

    Netanyahu, meanwhile, bombed Gaza during Trump’s trip to the region, killing more than 100 people in the last 24 hours, according to local health authorities.

    Asked about Israel’s plans for expanding the war in Gaza, as he pushes for a ceasefire, Trump struck a measured tone.

    “I think a lot of good things are going to happen over the next month, and we’re going to see. We have to help also out the Palestinians,” Trump said. “You know, a lot of people are starving on Gaza, so we have to look at both sides.”

    Even so, Israel is increasingly anxious about Trump striking a quick nuclear deal with Iran and Arab leaders shaping the president’s thinking, one person familiar with the dynamic between Trump and Netanyahu said.

    “The trip hasn’t so much put distance between Trump and Netanyahu as it has exposed it,” this person said.

    Trump, speaking to reporters, dismissed the notion that his trip marginalized America’s closest ally in the region. He said on Wednesday that the U.S. having a strong relationship with Arab leaders is “very good for Israel.”

    Across four breakneck days of deal-making, Arab leaders showed their ability to provide Trump with tangible economic wins he can showcase overseas as benefiting Americans back home, as well as the kind of warm welcome that resonates with the president. 

    “The job they’ve done in a fairly short period of time is just outstanding. They’re great people. Great leaders. Three great leaders,” Trump told reporters Friday as he headed back to Washington, D.C. “And the respect shown to our country was incredible. Because nobody is treated like that.”

    Trump’s relationship with Netanyahu, by contrast, is largely focused on national security concerns, from Iran to the war in Gaza to the shifting dynamics in Syria.

    So far, Israel has largely kept those concerns behind the scenes — which has not been the case with previous presidents, specifically Barack Obama and Joe Biden, even as they vowed to protect America’s “unbreakable bond” with Israel. And the U.S. continues to strongly support Israel, with Trump sending military equipment the Biden administration had paused.

    In a statement, National Security Council spokesman James Hewitt described Trump as Israel’s staunchest ally in its history.

    “Israel has had no better friend in its history than President Trump,” Hewitt said. “We continue to work closely with our ally Israel to ensure remaining hostages in Gaza are freed, Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon, and to strengthen regional security in the Middle East.”

    Hewitt added, “As he has repeatedly stated in his first and second terms, the President is committed to ensuring Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.”

    As for where the dynamic between Trump and Netanyahu goes next, one ally of the president made the case that deepening ties with Arab leaders will ultimately protect Israel because of its close relationship with the U.S. At the same time, the ally noted Trump’s characteristic unpredictability, saying, “Trump does what Trump does.”



    Source link

  • Secret Service agents question Comey about his Trump social media post

    Secret Service agents question Comey about his Trump social media post


    Secret Service agents interviewed former FBI director James Comey on Friday regarding his “8647” social media post that administration officials called a death threat against President Trump and Comey called a political statement.  

    “Today, federal agents from @SecretService interviewed disgraced former FBI Director Comey regarding a social media post calling for the assassination of President Trump,” DHS Secretary Kristi Noem posted on X Friday. “I will continue to take all measures necessary to ensure the protection of @POTUS Trump. This is an ongoing investigation.” 

    A lawyer for Comey declined to comment.

    Comey, a longtime Trump critic, deleted the photo — which showed seashells arranged in the shape of “8647”— within hours. He said it was a political message, not a violent one.

    “I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence,” Comey wrote on Instagram. “It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.” 

    In an interview with Fox News on Friday, Trump said that he believes Comey “knew exactly what he meant.”

    “A child knows what that meant… that meant ‘assassination,’” Trump said. “And it says it loud and clear. He wasn’t very competent, but he was competent enough to know what that meant.”

    Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Thursday that Comey should be jailed. 

    “I’m very concerned for the president’s life; we’ve already seen assassination attempts,” Gabbard said on Fox News. “I’m very concerned for his life and James Comey, in my view, should be held accountable and put behind bars for this.”

    Trump survived two assassination attempts during the 2024 campaign. In July, he was wounded in the ear at a campaign rally in Butler, PA, after a gunman shot at him from a nearby rooftop before being killed by Secret Service snipers.

    Two months later, a man aimed a rifle at Trump’s security detail while he was golfing in Florida. The man fled, was arrested and charged with attempting to assassinate a presidential candidate.

     President Donald Trump Makes First Middle East Trip Of His Second Term politics political politician wave
    President Donald Trump boards Air Force One as he departs the Al Bateen Executive Airport, in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, on Thursday.Win McNamee / Getty Images

    Meaning of “eighty-six” 

    The term “eighty-six” is an expression used in restaurants that means to “refuse to serve” or “reject or ban” a customer, to “remove (an item) from a menu,” or to “reject, discontinue, or get rid of (something),” according to Merriam-Webster. It dates back to the 1930s. 

    Republican politicians have used “86” in social media posts themselves in the past. Last year, former Florida Republican congressman Matt Gaetz posted on X, “We’ve now 86’d: McCarthy McDaniel McConnell Better days are ahead for the Republican Party.” 

    The tweet referred to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, former Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel, and former Senator majority leader Mitch McConnell, who had all left leadership posts in the Republican party. 

    On Friday, Gaetz told the Independent that his used of “86” was different than Comey’s. “I was speaking in the past tense about things that had already happened,” Gaetz said. “Comey was putting out a call for future action. These are distinct.”

    In 2022, conservative activist Jack Posobiec posted on X, “86 46,” an apparent reference to Joe Biden, the 46th president. Posobiec did not respond to a request for comment, according to the Independent.

    For months, the 8647 number sequence has been used and seen on anti-Trump t-shirts, buttons and other merchandise sold on Amazon and Etsy—some of which are still available for purchase—as well as signage on “Hands Off” protests across the country. Amazon and Etsy also sell items with the terms “8646” on them, referring to Biden. 

    During Trump’s first term, the numerical sequence was used as well. In 2020, Gretchen Whitmer, the Democratic governor of Michigan, was criticized after a pin with the numbers “8645” appeared on a table behind her during a television interview. 

    At the time, Trump was the 45th president. Whitmer denied that the term meant “assassinate.”

    After staffers in a Virginia restaurant asked White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders to leave in 2018, staffers wrote “86 — Sarah Huckabee Sanders,” in their overnight note, Politifact reported.  

    A former federal prosecutor who has investigated multiple threat cases against government officials said that Comey had not committed a crime. He said the federal criminal statute banning death threats against the president requires an individual to “knowingly and willingly” make an explicit threat “to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm.” 

    The former prosecutor, who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing fear of retaliation, said Comey’s post does not come close to meeting that legal threshold. 

    “He didn’t commit a crime, “the former prosecutor said. “He gave his enemies an opening.”  





    Source link

  • Republicans seek new oversight of online speech while boosting AI

    Republicans seek new oversight of online speech while boosting AI



    Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation over the last week that could give the federal government a tighter grasp on some tech platforms, while easing up government scrutiny on artificial intelligence.   

    The Republican-led House Energy and Commerce Committee’s budget reconciliation bill was introduced Tuesday and would give the federal government the ability to update IT systems as well as use AI systems at the Commerce Department. The bill would also put a pause on states’ ability to enforce AI regulations for the next decade to allow the American AI market to grow and be studied. 

     While some politicians have been skeptical and critical of AI, the Trump administration has been vocal about seeking to encourage the growth of the AI industry in the U.S. with few guardrails.  

    On Friday, to cap off President Donald Trump’s Middle East trip, the administration announced a deal with the United Arab Emirates to build a massive data center in the country that will serve American tech companies. 

    While Republicans have worked to protect AI, lawmakers have also introduced bills that would tighten regulations on some tech companies.

    Two of the bills could make rules for tech platforms and their users more restrictive with the intent of making children safer online.  

    On May 8, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would update “the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age,” Lee said in a statement

    IODA was first introduced in 2022, and again in 2024, but failed to become law. 

    IODA would change the definition of obscenity, which applies a three-pronged test to content, to anything that “appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion,” and “depicts, describes or represents actual or simulated sexual acts with the objective intent to arouse, titillate, or gratify the sexual desires of a person.”   

    It’s currently illegal to transmit obscene content via telecommunications if it’s intended as harassment or abuse. The bill would remove the requirement for that “intent,” meaning it could criminalize any content deemed obscene that is transmitted via telecommunications systems. 

    Despite the bill lacking bipartisan support or additional recorded co-sponsors, it has gained attention online and in the media for language that could make pornography something that can be prosecuted under laws pertaining to obscenity. However, proponents of the law hope it will prevent children from viewing lewd and obscene content. 

    Currently, social media platforms are granted a “good faith” immunity under Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which means they can’t be held legally liable for most content posted on their sites, aside from a few exceptions. Although a news release from Lee about IODA didn’t specify who would be held legally responsible for newly obscene content, it said the bill is meant to create a uniform definition of obscenity, so it would be easier to identify and prosecute obscene content. 

    “Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” Lee said in the statement. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.” 

    On Wednesday, the bi-partisan Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which would hold websites accountable if they host content that is harmful to children, was reintroduced in the Senate. 

    KOSA was first introduced in 2022 by Sens. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., but failed to make it out of the chamber. During the 2023-2024 congressional term, KOSA was introduced again with amendments to address concerns over the vague wording in the bill. In July, KOSA passed in the Senate, but by the end of 2024, it had failed to advance in the House.   

    The latest version of KOSA states that the bill would require social media platforms to “remove addictive product features,” give parents more control and oversight of their kids’ social media, create a duty for platforms to mitigate content focused on topics like suicide and disordered eating, and require transparency from social media platforms to share the steps they’re taking to protect children. 

    Those who are in favor of the bill say it would hold platforms legally accountable if they host harmful content that minors should not view. Opponents said it could inadvertently affect sites that host LGBTQ content. They’re also concerned it could lead to more censorship online.  

     “Sponsors are claiming—again—that the latest version won’t censor online content. It isn’t true. This bill still sets up a censorship regime disguised as a ‘duty of care,’ and it will do what previous versions threatened: suppress lawful, important speech online, especially for young people,” Joe Mullin, senior policy analyst for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said in a statement.   

    However, updates made to the bill help to make its reach less broad and remove attorneys’ general ability to prosecute platforms. It also makes more precise the harm it expects social media and other websites to protect against. This has led to some opponents of the bill changing their stance. 

    The bill was reintroduced with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., signing on. Last year, the bill passed in the Senate, 91-3, but died in the House. The current bill has been backed by Apple and Republican figures including Trump and Elon Musk. 

    In a statement, Apple’s senior director of government affairs for the Americas, Timothy Powderly, said the company was happy to offer its support for the bill, adding that everyone has a role to play in keeping children safe online. He also acknowledged the concerns around KOSA and praised the senators for working to improve the bill.  

    “As longtime advocates of privacy as a fundamental right, we believe these improvements are important, and hopefully the first steps towards comprehensive privacy legislation that ensures everyone’s right to privacy online,” Powderly said.    

    Critics have pushed back on both bills as some say they could result in overly policed speech online.   

    Matt Navarra, a social media consultant and analyst who has worked with companies like Google and the U.S. and U.K. governments, said the bills — particularly KOSA — could have significant ramifications for social media platforms and the way people use them. Navarra said KOSA would force platforms to “rethink recommendation engines, notifications, data tracking works for minors.” 

    “For engagement-driven platforms like TikTok or Instagram, that’s a radical shift — it’s not just about what’s allowed, it’s about how addictive and immersive experiences get redesigned or dismantled,” he said. “So KOSA is less about content policing and more about an algorithmic detox especially for teens.” 

    Adults would likely also see a major change in what is accessible online if IODA becomes law. 

    “In terms of the things that people are concerned about with the bill, particularly around censorship, KOSA does sort of introduce a duty of care that sounds good in theory but in practice could push platforms into over-moderating or flat-out removing content just to avoid the risk,” Navarra said. “And the obscenity bill wraps this up even more.” 



    Source link