Category: Uncategorized

  • ‘BookTok’ rocked by recent scandals

    ‘BookTok’ rocked by recent scandals



    A scandal over allegations of plagiarism is rocking the book community on TikTok, becoming the latest drama to unfold in a pocket of the internet that was once considered a safer space from online toxicity.

    “Beverly,” a romance novel by indie author Laura J. Robert, had picked up recent buzz on the social media platform, where readers and authors often discuss the latest titles and give recommendations.

    But several creators removed their videos praising Robert’s book after allegations emerged that it was a rip-off of the indie author R.J. Lewis’ “Obsessed,” which was published in 2016. Both books have plots that follow a lead female character and her romance with her childhood friend.

    Some people posted excerpts of Lewis’ words juxtaposed with Robert’s, identifying what they described as similarities. Others accused Robert of using artificial intelligence to tweak and lengthen Lewis’ book to create her own version. A handful of people speculated the authors could be the same person — because Robert’s initials are Lewis’ initials backward — and that the controversy could all be a PR stunt.

    NBC News was unable to reach Robert on Friday. Lewis declined to comment further.

    On BookTok, some have cited the somewhat niche controversy as yet another example of the community’s shift away from lighthearted content around new releases.

    “Does anyone miss just having a silly, goofy, fun time, having a bit of a laugh?” Lola Oluremi, a BookTok creator, said in a recent video discussing “Beverly” and “Obsessed.” “I feel like every time I log onto BookTok now, it’s something.”

    The online space, which has been credited for inspiring a fresh wave of interest in literature, hasn’t been devoid of drama in the past. But this month, the “Beverly” accusations followed two other separate situations that had caused some division among BookTokers online.

    Author Ali Hazelwood, who is behind popular novels such as “The Love Hypothesis,” left Instagram purportedly after she was “bullied” for a comment she made during a panel discussion at the Los Angeles Times Festival of Books in April.

    Hazelwood weighed in on who she thought Katniss Everdeen, the protagonist of Suzanne Collins’ “Hunger Games” books, should have ended up with romantically, saying it should have been her childhood friend Gale, rather than her fellow tribute, Peeta.

    “He’s a terrible, mean, selfish person,” Hazelwood said of the character Peeta, a baker’s son from District 12 who was reaped alongside Katniss in the books. The clip of Hazelwood’s remarks was widely circulated and blasted online by people who accused her of having a bad take.

    Hazelwood didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Since she went dark online, several BookTokers have come to her defense, reflecting on how the community has seemingly become more prone to getting lost in meaningless discourse.

    “The way y’all have lost the plot over a fictional bread boy has left me genuinely questioning the mental health of the book community,” Shelley Fleuridor, the YouTuber behind the channel “Book Chats with Shelley,” said in a recent video delving into the Hazelwood backlash. “We need to talk about what’s happening to this community and why some of you genuinely need to be placed in a reading timeout immediately, maybe permanently.”

    Also this past month, Victoria Aveyard, the author of the “Red Queen” books, sparked a wave of backlash and speculation on BookTok after she post a video alluding to another author’s using generative AI in a novel without naming the purported writer. She said she didn’t name the person because she didn’t want to get sued.

    “Using GenAI to come up with characters, plots and story ideas isn’t writing. It’s theft,” Aveyard said. “Using GenAI doesn’t make you a writer. It makes you a thief.” She said generative AI has been trained on copyrighted material that “has been stolen from artists without license or compensation.”

    Some subsequent posts from users accuse Aveyard of being a “mean girl” obsessed with “drama.” In other videos, some try to guess which author she was referring to. Meanwhile, a handful of authors have also been posting videos of their writing and editing processes to prove their work isn’t made with AI.

    With “Beverly,” it remains unclear whether there will be consequences for Robert beyond online fallout.

    Robert’s social media pages and her author website were no longer online Friday. “Beverly” has also been removed from Amazon. The title remains on GoodReads, where several people have posted comments about the plagiarism accusations and given the book a one-star review.

    A spokesperson for Amazon, which owns GoodReads, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Lewis posted about the plagiarism allegations on Instagram this week, calling the situation an indie author’s “worst nightmare.”

    “I’m an author who does not have a big online presence and thank all who have reached out to bring this to my attention as I don’t have much visibility on the social media space,” she wrote.

    She said she has contacted Amazon to raise a copyright infringement case and hopes “that people in the booktok space realize this author is stealing content and profiting from it.”





    Source link

  • Pilot killed in North Carolina crash was trying to avoid hitting turtle on runway

    Pilot killed in North Carolina crash was trying to avoid hitting turtle on runway



    MOCKSVILLE, N.C. — The pilot of a small plane that crashed near a North Carolina airport this month had raised a wheel after landing to avoid hitting a turtle on the runway, according to a National Transportation Safety Board preliminary report.

    The pilot of the Universal Stinson 108 and a passenger were killed in the June 3 crash near Sugar Valley Airport in Mocksville, officials said. A second passenger was seriously injured in the crash.

    A communications operator looking out the airport office window advised the pilot that there was a turtle on the runway, according to the report released this week. The operator reported that the pilot landed about 1,400 feet down the 2,424-foot runway, then lifted the right main wheel to avoid the turtle. The operator heard the pilot advance the throttle after raising the wheel, but the airplane left her view after that.

    A man cutting the grass at the end of the runway reported seeing the pilot raise the right wheel to avoid the turtle, then the wings rocked back and forth and the plane took off again, according to the report. The man lost sight of the plane and then he heard a crash and saw smoke.

    The plane crashed in a heavily forested area about 255 feet from the runway and caught fire, officials said. The plane was wedged between several trees and remained in one piece except for a few pieces of fabric found in a nearby stream. It came to rest on its left side with the left wing folded underneath the fuselage and the right wing bent toward the tail.

    Preliminary reports contain facts collected on scene, but don’t speculate on probable causes, according to the NTSB’s website. Those are included in final reports, which can take one to two years to complete.



    Source link

  • Colorado man charged again with first degree murder of wife who went missing in 2020

    Colorado man charged again with first degree murder of wife who went missing in 2020


    A Colorado man suspected of killing his wife was charged Friday for the second time with first degree murder in her 2020 death, the Twelfth Judicial District Attorney’s Office said in a release.

    Barry Morphew was previously charged with first degree murder, among other charges, in May 2021 in the killing of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, who was last seen on Mother’s Day in 2020. But those charges were dropped without prejudice — meaning charges could be filed again at a later date — in April 2022 as prosecutors were closing in on finding the woman’s remains.

    Officials took Morphew into custody Friday in Arizona, the District Attorney’s office said, but the office is working to extradite the man back to the San Luis Valley in Colorado.

    Barry Morphew outside the Chaffee County Courthouse, circa Jan. 2022.
    Barry Morphew outside the Chaffee County Courthouse, circa Jan. 2022.Dateline

    It was not immediately clear whether Morphew is being held in jail or he has obtained legal representation.

    Iris Eytan, the attorney who represented Morphew in the earlier charges, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was not immediately clear if she is still representing him.

    Suzanne Morphew was last seen on May 10, 2020, near County Road 225 and West Highway 50 in Maysville, about 100 miles west of Colorado Springs. She was on a bike ride at the time.

    A 49-year-old mother of two, Suzanne Morphew was reported missing from her Chaffee County home that same day. Also that day, her mountain bike and helmet were discovered on the side of a county road in Salida, Colorado, near the family’s home.

    murder victim
    Suzanne Morphew.Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office

    Her husband had repeatedly denied his involvement in her death and pleaded not guilty to the initial charges.

    One week before Morphew was set to stand trial on the initial charge of first degree murder in his wife’s disappearance, prosecutors dismissed the charges because they said they had zeroed in on an area where they believed her remains to be, but weather in the region was prohibiting officials from recovery efforts, slowing down the case.

    Suzanne Morphew’s remains were finally uncovered in September 2023, officials said at the time. They were found during an unrelated search near Moffat in Saguache County.

    An April 2024 autopsy determined she died by homicide, which reported that drugs normally used as animal tranquilizers were found in her system.

    Suzanne Morphew “died as a result of homicide by unspecified means in the setting of butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine intoxication,” the El Paso County coroner’s report, obtained by NBC News at the time, said.

    “The drugs are marketed as a compound injectable chemical immobilizer for wildlife providing pharmacologically reversible analgesia, sedation, and immobilization,” according to the report.

    Prosecutors had said they believed Morphew used a tranquilizer gun in his wife’s murder. They had also said he was the only one with motive to kill Suzanne Morphew, because she was having an affair, believed her husband was having one, too, and had plans to file for divorce.

    Days before her disappearance, Suzanne Morphew texted her husband that their relationship was “done,” according to the initial arrest affidavit from 2021.

    “Let’s handle this civilly,” she said, according to the affidavit.

    “It had become clear that Barry could not control Suzanne’s insistence on leaving him, and he resorted to something he has done his entire life — hunt and control Suzanne like he had hunted and controlled animals,” the affidavit said.

    Morphew also filed a $15 million lawsuit against authorities who accused him of killing his wife in May 2023. At the time, the couple’s daughters spoke in support of their father.

    The District Attorney’s office in the Friday release said the investigation into Suzanne Morphew’s death has been ongoing.

    “Federal, State and local law enforcement have never stopped working toward justice for Suzanne,” said Twelfth Judicial District Attorney Anne Kelly.



    Source link

  • Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud

    Walmart to pay $10 million to settle lawsuit over money transfer fraud



    Walmart has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a U.S. Federal Trade Commission civil lawsuit accusing the world’s largest retailer of ignoring warning signs that fraudsters used its money transfer services to fleece consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

    The settlement was filed on Friday in Chicago federal court, and requires approval by U.S. District Judge Manish Shah.

    Walmart also agreed not to process money transfers it suspects are fraudulent, or help sellers and telemarketers it believes are using its services to commit fraud.

    “Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it’s sent, it’s gone for good,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC consumer protection bureau. “Companies that provide these services must train their employees to comply with the law and work to protect consumers.”

    The Arkansas-based retailer did not admit or deny wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. Walmart did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    In its June 2022 complaint, the FTC accused Walmart of turning a blind eye to fraudsters who used its money transfer services to cash out at its stores.

    Walmart acts as an agent for money transfers by companies such as MoneyGram and Western Union. Money can be hard to trace once delivered.

    The FTC said fraudsters used many schemes that included impersonating Internal Revenue Service agents, impersonating family members who needed money from grandparents to avoid jail, and telling victims they won lotteries or sweepstakes but owed fees to collect their winnings.

    Shah dismissed part of the FTC case last July but let the regulator pursue the remainder. Walmart appealed from that decision. Friday’s settlement would end the appeal.



    Source link

  • S&P 500 posts third straight losing day as traders eye Middle East tensions, Trump’s next steps

    S&P 500 posts third straight losing day as traders eye Middle East tensions, Trump’s next steps



    The S&P 500 fell on Friday as investors monitored the latest developments out of the Middle East. Traders also contemplated the path of future interest rate cuts by Federal Reserve.

    The broad market index declined 0.22% to end at 5,967.84, while the Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.51% and settled at 19,447.41. The Dow Jones Industrial Average ticked up 35.16 points, or 0.08%, closing at 42,206.82.

    Chip stocks came under pressure following a report by The Wall Street Journal that the U.S. may revoke waivers for some semiconductor manufacturers. Nvidia was down more than 1%, while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing slid nearly 2%. The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) was lower by nearly 1%.

    The S&P 500 started off the trading session higher after Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said that the central bank could cut rates as early as July. “I think we’re in the position that we could do this and as early as July,” Waller said during a “Squawk Box” interview.

    “That would be my view, whether the committee would go along with it or not,” he added.

    This comes after Fed Chair Jerome Powell said Wednesday the central bank was in no hurry to cut benchmark rates and will remain data dependent, especially as it remains unclear how President Donald Trump’s tariffs will impact the economy. The S&P 500 closed slightly lower that day following those remarks.

    Trump ripped into Powell again Thursday, saying the Fed Chair is costing the U.S. “hundreds of billions of dollars” by delaying rate cuts. The president said ahead of the Fed’s decision Wednesday that “stupid” Powell “probably won’t cut” rates.

    Tensions around the Israel-Iran conflict also remained high, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly ordering Jerusalem’s military to strike “strategic targets” in Iran, as well as “government targets.”

    Trump is weighing direct U.S. involvement with a strike on Tehran, with the White House on Thursday saying that he will make a final decision within the next two weeks. Trump previously called for Tehran’s complete surrender, to which Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, labeled the notion “threatening and ridiculous.”

    “With so much uncertainty going on in this world, who really wants to go long over the weekend,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research. He also pointed out that the S&P 500 is still trading at just around 3% below its recent 52-week high, saying that “prior highs act like rusty doors and require several attempts before finally swinging open.”

    “If there’s a calming down of the geopolitical activities, then you know that could be helpful,” he continued.

    For the week, the S&P 500 was about 0.2% lower. The 30-stock Dow eked out a 0.02% gain on the week, while the Nasdaq advanced 0.2%.



    Source link

  • Iranian foreign minister questions if U.S. government can be trusted

    Iranian foreign minister questions if U.S. government can be trusted


    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

    • ‘She’s wrong’: Trump breaks with Gabbard on Iran assessment

      01:01

    • Now Playing

      Iranian foreign minister on U.S.: ‘We don’t know how we can trust them anymore’

      04:11

    • UP NEXT

      Drone strike in Tehran, missile fire in Israel: Tensions escalate amid diplomatic talks

      03:13

    • Two-week warning: Trump buys time on potential U.S. strikes against Iran

      10:19

    • WH: Trump to decide in the next two weeks on whether to attack Iran

      10:20

    • Haass: Israeli defense minister is ‘truly misguided’ for not wanting to negotiate with Ayatollah

      10:47

    • Israel: Iranian leader ‘cannot continue to exist’

      04:53

    • Trump weighs possible U.S. strike on Iran, suggests it will be game-time decision

      10:08

    • Growing MAGA rift over Trump response to Iran

      06:44

    • See Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson brawl over Iran as MAGA infighting explodes into open

      09:02

    • Sen. Warner says Trump admin having ‘no plan’ for Middle East is ‘irresponsibility on steroids’

      06:58

    • Sen. Van Hollen on Iran: Trump ‘doesn’t have’ power to declare war

      05:29

    • Israeli Ambassador to U.S.: Our goal is ‘defanging’ Iran

      08:05

    • What’s the risk to the U.S. if ‘all-out ’ Israel-Iran war breaks out? Col. Jacobs weighs in

      11:54

    • Trump: ‘I may, I may not’ on plans to strike Iran

      11:15

    • Trump on Iran: ‘The next week is going to be very big’

      08:34

    • ‘UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!’: Trump makes demands for Iran amid conflict with Israel

      11:51

    • Where do the Iranian people stand with the regime? Foreign policy expert explains more

      05:37

    • Israel-Iran conflict is a ‘very dangerous’ moment for entire world: Global security expert

      08:44

    • ‘Bunker-buster bomb’ drop would make U.S. ‘directly involved’ in Israel-Iran war: Rhodes

      06:30

    NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell interviewed Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Geneva, Switzerland about the growing tensions between Israel, the U.S. and Iran. Araghchi said Iran does not know if the U.S. can be trusted anymore and calls the Trump administrations’ actions a “betrayal to diplomacy.”

    MSNBC HIGHLIGHTS (BEST OF MSNBC)

    Play All

    The Briefing with Jen Psaki

    The Briefing with Jen Psaki

    The Briefing with Jen Psaki

    The Briefing with Jen Psaki

    Play All



Source link

  • Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez’s wedding in Venice is approaching: Everything to Know

    Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez’s wedding in Venice is approaching: Everything to Know


    Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and his fiancée, Emmy-winning journalist Lauren Sanchez, are getting set to tie the knot in one of the year’s most anticipated weddings.

    “(I’m) very excited about it,” she told Hoda Kotb and Savannah Guthrie while appearing on TODAY in November 2024. “(I’m) thinking about the dress, I have to say. I do have a Pinterest. I’m just like every other bride. So I do have a Pinterest board.”

    Sanchez, 55, is also a pilot and children’s book author whom many fans may recognize for her work as a correspondent on “Extra.” She said she is amazed at the trajectory of her own life.

    “I never thought at 54 — I’m going to be 55 — that I’d be an author, that I’d be getting married,” she said on TODAY. “I mean, life is just beginning. When I was 20, I thought, ‘Oh my gosh, life is over at 50.’ Let me tell you: It is not, ladies. It is not over. It is just beginning.”

    When is Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez’s wedding?

    The couple’s wedding celebration is expected to take place from June 24 to June 26 in Venice, Italy, a spokesperson for the mayor of Venice had told CNN.

    Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez at the 2024 Met Gala.
    Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez in New York in 2024. Cindy Ord / Getty Images for The Met Museum

    Where is it?

    The wedding will take place in Venice, Italy. The impending nuptials have sparked protests from people who are concerned that the couple are taking over the city and causing overcrowding, as tourists have descended upon Venice.

    Despite the outrage, the Municipality of Venice said in a statement in March that the city is ready to oversee the wedding.

    “The many speculations and fake news circulating about Jeff Bezos’ wedding are completely unfounded,” the municipality said. “Only 200 guests will have been invited and therefore it will be easy for Venice to accommodate such an event, without any disruption whatsoever to the city, its residents and visitors.”

    "No Space for Bezos" sign displayed in Venice ahead of Jeff Bezos-Lauren Sanchez wedding.
    A poster reading “No Space for Bezos” and calling for protest is pasted on a wall in Venice.Andrea Pattaro / AFP – Getty Images

    Who is on the guest list?

    The guest list hasn’t been released, but People reported Sanchez’s bachelorette party in May featured the likes of Katy Perry — who flew aboard with Sanchez on Bezos’ Blue Origin all-female trip to space in April — Kim Kardashian, Kris Jenner and Eva Longoria.

    Vogue reports the party had other heavy hitters on hand, too, including Fox Sports’ Charissa Thompson and Veronica Grazer, whose husband is Hollywood producer Brian Grazer.

    When did Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez get engaged?

    The couple were first romantically linked in 2019, according to People.

    Bezos and Sanchez announced their engagement in 2023. Earlier that year, Sanchez gushed about Bezos in an Instagram post for his birthday.

    “Happy birthday to the man of my dreams, who lights up my world with his laughter and kind heart,” she wrote.

    “You have shown me that no great love is not bravely fought for. Thank you for always being by my side and for being the most loving and supportive partner. I am so grateful for the memories we have made and the adventures yet to come. Here’s to many more birthdays filled with love and laughter.

    “Te amo con todo mi corazon,” she ended the post, which is Spanish for, “I love you with all my heart.”

    Lauren Sanchez and Jeff Bezos in 2020.
    Lauren Sanchez and Jeff Bezos in 2020.WWD / Penske Media via Getty Images

    Have Jeff Bezos or Lauren Sanchez been married before?

    Bezos was previously married to MacKenzie Scott from 1993 to 2019. The couple have four children together.

    Sanchez was previously married to Hollywood agent Patrick Whitesell, with whom she has two kids. She also has a son with her former partner Tony Gonzalez, a retired NFL star.





    Source link

  • Supreme Court rejects Trump tariff challenge fast track

    Supreme Court rejects Trump tariff challenge fast track



    The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request from two toy companies to expedite their challenge to President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

    The ruling from the nation’s high court means that the Trump administration now has the standard 30-day window to file its response to the challenge.

    Two small family-owned companies, Learning Resources and hand2mind, argued that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not give Trump the authority to implement his tariffs on products from China.

    The companies on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to expedite consideration of their challenge and bypass a federal appeals court.

    “In light of the tariffs’ massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the president claims, challenges to the IEEPA tariffs cannot await the normal appellate process,” the companies argued in their request.

    Trump’s tariffs, a key part of his economic agenda, have drawn legal challenges from businesses and individuals questioning his authority to implement the high levies.

    A federal appeals court earlier this month allowed Trump’s tariffs to remain in effect until it hears arguments at the end of next month.



    Source link

  • Suspect arrested after GOP Rep. Max Miller says he was ‘run off the road’ by a man waving a Palestinian flag

    Suspect arrested after GOP Rep. Max Miller says he was ‘run off the road’ by a man waving a Palestinian flag



    CLEVELAND — Rep. Max Miller, R-Ohio, said he was “run off the road” Thursday morning in a Cleveland suburb by a man who waved a Palestinian flag and threatened Miller and his young daughter.

    The alleged incident, which comes amid acute concerns about a rise in political violence, is being investigated by the U.S. Capitol Police and by police in Rocky River, Ohio.

    A suspect, Feras S. Hamdan of Westlake, Ohio, turned himself in to Rocky River police after Miller signed a criminal complaint for aggravated menacing and an arrest warrant was issued, Rocky River officials said. Hamdan’s attorney did not immediately respond to a message.

    “I was just driving to work, and I was cut off by a man in a Tesla who held up a Palestinian flag to me, and then rolled down his window and said that ‘I’m going to cut your throat and your daughter’s,’” Miller, who is Jewish, is heard saying on a 911 call, audio of which the Rocky River Police Department released along with a statement Friday. “And he said, ‘You’re a dirty Jew. I’m going to f—–g kill you all, and I know who you are and where you live.’”

    Miller, 36, told 911 dispatchers that he followed the man on Interstate 90 and rolled down his window to better hear what he was saying and to take note of his license plate number.

    “I am a little shaken, to be quite honest,” Miller told a dispatcher in Lakewood, the neighboring suburb where Miller exited the interstate. “I have a weapon on me. I’m glad I didn’t use it.”

    During one stretch of Miller’s 911 call, a vehicle’s horn can be heard honking — a detail that the dispatcher noted to police officials for their report.

    The police report also noted that while officers searched the interstate for a “flag that may have been thrown out” of the suspect’s car, no flag was located there.

    Julie Morron, operations manager for the Rocky River Police Department, said a flag has yet to be found but that the investigation is ongoing.

    Miller publicly commented on the alleged incident Thursday in a video accompanying a social media post in which he expressed relief that his daughter, who is 1, was not in the car with him.

    A police report was not available to the public in the immediate hours after Thursday’s alleged incident, with officials waiting to gather more details before releasing documents Friday. Morron told NBC News on Thursday that Miller had been the alleged victim of a “road rage incident” and “could not wait to speak with officers” but agreed to later in the day. The suspect’s car also had left the area by the time local officers responded, police said.

    In his video, Miller said that he had “gone about my day” and “carried on” with scheduled meetings. In a text message late Thursday, Miller wrote that he wanted to keep to his “set schedule of meetings” to “send a message” that his work would not be slowed by the incident.

    Miller was later interviewed by police in Rocky River, according to the department’s statement.

    “After further investigation, the second party to the road rage incident was identified” as Hamdan, the department said. Hamdan is awaiting a court appearance.

    Rocky River officials are investigating the incident, along with Capitol Police, the FBI, the Ohio State Highway Patrol and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Ohio, Rocky River police said.

    In a statement Friday, the Capitol Police said the department immediately deployed special agents to the area to assist in the investigation and to locate Hamdan.

    “In less than 24 hours, the USCP received notification of a threat against a Member of Congress, had boots on the ground, collaborated with the local police department, and the suspect in the case was arrested that same evening,” acting Capitol Police Chief Sean Gallagher said the statement. “This case is a prime example of the USCP’s stance towards threats against our elected officials. We will continue to have a zero-tolerance policy.”

    The alleged incident occurred about 10 miles west of Cleveland and came less than a week after two Democratic state lawmakers were shot — one fatally — in what authorities have described as a politically motivated attack in Minnesota.

    “If you have an issue with a legislator, your city councilman, your mayor, anyone like that, the appropriate thing to do is to reach out to them for a phone call, to set up a meeting at one of our district offices,” Miller said in his video. “What is not OK is to assault anyone, whether you’re a member of Congress or anybody else within our district, while you’re driving to work.”

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., wrote in a social media post Thursday that the alleged incident “is yet another outrageous example of unhinged rhetoric inspiring unstable people to threaten and attack elected officials who are serving their communities.”

    Johnson added: “We must turn down the temperature in this country.”

    House Democratic leaders also condemned the alleged incident.

    “We condemn in the strongest possible terms the attack on Congressman Max Miller and his family and are thankful they are safe,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York, Democratic Whip Katherine Clark of Massachusetts and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar of California said Thursday in a joint statement. “The rise in political violence in this country is unacceptable. This is a moment of crisis that requires Congress to act decisively in order to ensure the safety of every single Member who serves in the People’s House.”



    Source link

  • In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors ‘moneyed interests’

    In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors ‘moneyed interests’



    WASHINGTON — Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her colleagues on Friday in a scathing dissent on a case involving vehicle emissions regulations.

    In her dissenting opinion, she argued that the court’s opinion gives the impression it favors “moneyed interests” in the way they decide which cases to hear and how they rule in them. The court had ruled 7-2 in favor of fuel producers seeking to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of California clean vehicle emissions regulations.

    She also said she was concerned that the ruling could have “a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests.”

    With the Trump administration reversing course on many of Biden’s environmental policies, including on California’s electric vehicle mandates, the case is likely moot, or soon to be, Jackson wrote, making her wonder why the court felt the need to decide it.

    “This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this court than ordinary citizens,” Jackson wrote.

    The case said that the producers had legal standing to bring their claims, resting on a theory “that the court has refused to apply in cases brought by less powerful plaintiffs,” she added.

    The decision has little practical importance now, but in future, “will no doubt aid future attempts by the fuel industry to attack the Clean Air Act,” she said.

    “Also, I worry that the fuel industry’s gain comes at a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests,” she added.

    The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has often faced claims that it is particularly receptive to arguments made by big business. The conservative justices have been especially skeptical of broad government regulations and they have consistently made it harder for consumers and workers to bring class action lawsuits.

    Last year, the court overturned a 40-year precedent much loathed by business interests that empowered federal agencies in the regulatory process.

    Some legal experts have pushed back, saying such allegations are misleading.

    Jackson concluded her dissent by noting the court’s “simultaneous aversion to hearing cases involving the potential vindication of less powerful litigants — workers, criminal defendants, and the condemned, among others.”

    Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who authored the majority opinion, responded to her claims, saying that a review of standing cases “disproves that suggestion.” He mentioned several recent rulings in which liberal justices were in the majority, including one last year finding that anti-abortion doctors who challenged the abortion pill mifepristone did not have standing to sue.

    The bottom line, he added, is that the government “may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders.”

    Jonathan Adler, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law whose scholarship pushes back on Jackson’s theory, said it was notable that no other justices, including her two fellow liberals, signed on to her dissent.

    “I don’t think this case is an example of the court being inconsistent or somehow more favorable to moneyed interests than other sorts of interests,” he said in an interview with NBC News. “It’s not like the court has closed the door on environmental groups.”

    Adler, who Jackson cited in her dissent, said it can be “very simplistic” to classify cases as pro-business or anti-business simply because there can often be wealthy interests on both sides.

    The underlying case stems from the EPA’s authority to issue national vehicle emissions standards under the federal Clean Air Act.

    In recognition of California’s historic role in regulating emissions, the law allows the EPA to give the state a waiver from the nationwide standards so that it can adopt its own. The case focused on a request made by California in 2012 that EPA approve new regulations, not the state’s 2024 plan to eliminate gasoline-powered cars by 2035 for which it also sought a waiver.

    The Republican-controlled Congress voted earlier this month to revoke that waiver.



    Source link